Celebrating ....

CELEBRATING The PJ's 50th YEAR! * www.junto.blogspot.com * Dr Franklin's Diary * Home of the Philly Cheapskate*Contact @ WritersClearinghouse@yahoo.com * Join WritersClearinghouse at Facebook, Instagram, etc. *Meeting @ Philadelphia * Empowered by WritersClearinghouse.
Showing posts with label Miscellaneous. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Miscellaneous. Show all posts

Tuesday, 9 July 2013

Power Trip

 
 
112 JOINS 911 AS
EMERGENCY NUMBER
 
Don't 'cell' your mobile short.
 
While your phone provider is not quick to reveal any cell phone 'secrets,' more and more consumers are learning that their mobileshave less than well-known -- even hidden -- features.
 
Like a free battery boost, for example. Even if your battery strength is low when in an emergency, don't worry. Press *3370#. Your phone will restart, showing a 50 percent boost from a otherwise unknown power reserve. (The next time to charge your phone, the reserve will also get re-energized. 

Wednesday, 5 June 2013

Bar None

 

Chinese Clouds Have Silver Linings

 中國的雲總是有銀襯裡

阿德里安 冯韦什特
[Special to The Philadelphia Junto]
 
London
Historically, silver has always had a greater value within China than anywhere else in the world. Today, as with most things Chinese, we find history repeating itself. In the 16th & 17th centuries silver had a value double in China to that of Europe, the very same phenomenon being seen today.

Thursday, 16 June 2011

Old Wars Provide Lessons...

... In Stopping Our Current Ones 

Drunk on Wars: the Long Hangover.
Rabbi Arthur Waskow
50 Years of Staggering down the Wrong Road

By Arthur Waskow
[Special to Writers Clearinghouse News Service]

Between 1961 and 1971, the United States undertook three different wars. All of them were abysmal disasters.

One was the war against Vietnam, begun in 1961 by President John F Kennedy and expanded after his death by President Lyndon Johnson. The second was “the war on poverty,” initiated by President Johnson in 1964. The third was the “war on drugs,” initiated by President Richard M Nixon in 1971.

The first war resulted in the deaths of about 50,000 Americans and more than 1 million Vietnamese, and ended in 1975 with military and political defeat for this attempt to extend the American Empire and with the hasty withdrawal of American troops.

One might say “ignominious withdrawal” except that the true ignominy was that of the US government under three presidents, who had for no decent purpose wasted these lives and enormous resources that could have been meeting human needs, in America and the world. Indeed, the Pentagon Papers, published forty years ago, show that the Pentagon soon knew the war could not be “won.” From then on, its purpose was to terrorize nationalist movements in countries other than Vietnam by showing how bloody would be the cost of any uprisings against Western control.

The second “war” was – laudably -- not a war at all. Utterly unlike a war, which tries to impose order by violence from the top down that disempowers most of the country and people under attack, this policy tried to abolish poverty by empowering the poor. Indeed, one of the key elements in its efforts was “maximum feasible participation of the poor” in shaping the change in their own lives.

It was abandoned within two years because there was no money to put into serious change in ending and preventing poverty in America. The reason there was no money? The enormous costs of the real war against Vietnam.

In other words, 'guns over butter.' Choosing between a top-down war that killed more than a million people and a bottom-up effort to abolish poverty, the US political system chose war.

Then in 1971, the Nixon Administration announced an all-out “war” on drugs. This looked a lot more like war -- top-down violence, massive numbers of prisoners, increasing deaths. But the war was fought mainly against the nonviolent users of drugs, not against the sometimes violent purveyors.

And after forty years -– by far the longest “war” in US history -– the results are: more than a million nonviolent “criminals” in US prisons; the supply of tens of thousands of guns by US sellers across the Mexican border to drug cartels which use them against Mexican and US police and against civilians; spiraling deaths in cities like Juarez -– and no diminution in the use of drugs!

When the US government chose to fight wars in Vietnam and on the street corners where drugs are sold, it did not bother to look either at why Vietnamese were prepared to die in order to choose their own government, or why Americans were taking drugs.

If the US had looked carefully at Vietnam, it might have actually encouraged the impulse to end colonialism and foreign domination.

If the US had looked carefully at the urban street corners and the small towns where jobs had disappeared and at the GI hangouts of trauma and despair in Vietnam that themselves became hotbeds of the “drug epidemic,” they might have realized what the unmet needs were that led to the drug use. They might have realized that a “war on drugs” was precisely the wrong answer.

What were those unmet needs? Three: worthy jobs, a meaningful place in society, and non-drug moments of spiritual exaltation.

Paul Goodman’s book Growing Up Absurd addressed the first two, and became the sacred literature of many in the social-change movements of the Sixties because it named what young people knew was missing from their lives. (Goodman addressed only the plight of young men, but women soon realized they were suffering the same lacks.)

The absence of worthy jobs and a meaningful social place in some chunks of American society was a result of the failure of the misnamed “war on poverty.” If the effort to assist a grass-roots self-organizing movement of the poor had continued, instead of being snuffed out by Vietnam, and if military “service” in Vietnam had not itself poisoned a generation of many young men with despair that only drugs could nullify, then absurdity would not have been the fate of many young Americans. Drugs would not have been their need and their escape.

As for exaltation: In 1971, Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel was writing, "I interpret the young people's escape to drugs as coming from their driving desire to experience moments of exaltation.... The classical form of exaltation is worship.... But exaltation is gone from the synagogue [and] from the church....

“Our life thus devours the wisdom of religious tradition without deriving from it sources of renewal and uplift.... The new witnesses for a revival of the spirit in America may well turn out to be those poor miserable men and women who are victims of the narcotics epidemic. If we will but . . . try to understand their misguided search for exaltation, we can begin the task of turning curse into blessing." ("In Search of Exaltation," pp. 227-229, Moral Grandeur and Spiritual Audacity, Susannah Heschel, ed. (Farrar Straus Giroux, 1996.)

Just as the ”war on drugs” was beginning under President Nixon, Rabbi Heschel was more truly naming the response we needed. And still need:

Worthy jobs paying enough to make an honorable life possible, and time for celebration that can exalt the place of a citizen in the eco-system of human society interwoven with the eco-system of all life-forms.

A living wage, and livable hours. “Six days shalt thou labor and do all your work, and on the seventh you shall pause to celebrate, give thanks, experience exaltation, reflect, share, love.” Given the technology we now have, the ratio should probably be “Four days shalt thou labor,” but the rhythm is crucial.

Why then did the US government and even such institutions as churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, not follow the path that Goodman and Heschel were blazing?

Because if you are powerful and reluctant to share your power by empowering the powerless, it is far more attractive to make war from the top-down than it is to encourage self-organizing at the grass roots or the cement pavements.

Because if you are afraid of uppity young black men but can no longer humiliate and disempower them into subservience with pleasant “White-only” soda fountains, grungy “Black-only” bathrooms, and lousy black-only schools, then you can write laws that define black ways of consuming cocaine as worthy of five times the prison time as white-suburbanite ways of consuming cocaine, and throw millions of blacks into prison. While they are there, they are not counted among the “unemployed,” and when they get out, they cannot get jobs anyway.

And so America got drunk on war, and the hangover has lasted fifty bleary years. Those who controlled our government, our lives, first found themselves lying filthy in a ditch of their own disenchantment, being challenged by the myriad movements for self-empowerment that grew out of the war-spree of the Sixties. But soon the powerful recovered from a brief period of alcoholics’ remorse.

Confronted with the murderous attacks of 9/11, they chose to use the drunkards’ response to being an alcoholic: They chose to “drink the hair of the dog that bit them” –- the hair of war and violence. They chose to repeat the blindness of the war on Vietnam and the war on drugs. Instead of asking what had led a tiny band of terrorists to do these murderous deeds, and then seeking to do at home and abroad the grass-roots empowerment that the misnamed “war on poverty” had promised and abandoned, they went to war.

They smashed Iraq, they are still smashing Afghanistan, they have started smashing Pakistan and Yemen, they have allied themselves with a right-wing Israeli government’s effort to smash any vestige of Palestine.

And even when the most respected scientists throughout the world shout warnings that they are smashing the planet itself, even when climate-driven droughts and floods destroy crops, when food prices jump and people starve and movements of the hungry shake the Arab world, they multiply their own wealth and power and pretend that global scorching is not happening.

But once again, the disempowered are stirring. Tens of thousands of teachers, firefighters, social workers in Madison Wisconsin, and thousands of supporters around the country. Conservative elders in upstate New York. Tens of thousands of people at thousands of locations around the world, speaking out against the Drug Lords of Big Oil Big Coal, demaning action to restore the bearable ceiling of 350 parts per million of CO2 in the atmosphere.

And finally, even the US military budget is no longer a sacred cow. Finally, a bipartisan vote fell only 11 votes short (204-215) in the House of Representatives of requiring the US to begin detailed planning now to withdraw troops from Afghanistan and prepare for the transition to Afghan civilian and military control.

The need to meet civilian needs in the US is finally beginning to match the hangover of war-drunk top-down power. But the shift needs our energy!

Giving our energy, against the entrenched power of those drunk on war and violence, will not be easy. Here we must listen to Rabbi Heschel. “Exaltation” is what we will need, as the exalted prayerful joy of black folk singing prayer in the streets is what we needed fifty years ago.

(Arthur Waskow is a rabbi who heads the Shalom Center in Philadelphia).

Monday, 7 June 2010

In the Jumpseat

Commanded and Uncontrolled

By Justin T. Carreño,
Junto Staff Writer Bio
For a period of time, while living in Arlington, Virginia, my work was located across the street from my apartment. Living in northern Virginia, or NOVA, an outlying base of official Washington, it's common to run across people who are gun-ho military. Arlington, specifically, is crawling with military personnel, as well as government-employed civilians, many of whom are government contractors, known as "govies."  It wasn't strange then that I met plenty of them in my apartment building.

Working across the street, I commonly would go home for lunch. During one of these lunch-breaks, I noticed, as I walked out of my building, a blacked out, new, shiny SUV parked in driveway. I didn't think much of it. NOVA is loaded with government cars.

This was different. As I passed the car, red and blue lights began flashing and a voice over an amplifier said ominously, "You, come here. Get in!" This command obviously caught my attention. I was wondering what the police wanted with me. I kept walking past the vehicle, and then turned around to see what this was all about. And a familiar face, a friend, was sticking his head outside the driver-side window. I just looked in wonderment and shook my head.

"For real?" I thought. He said, "Just get in. It's my boss's car."

 "Right. OK,"  I thought. I'll go along with it. I wasn't in a rush to get back to work. I hopped into the luxurious vehicle. It was decked out like a stretch limousine -- plush leather seats, lighting, a glass automated divider between the front driver section and the back passenger section. A heavy armored doors.

My friend said, "Watch this." We raced around Arlington dashing in and out of traffic, going down one-way streets the wrong way, feeling the power. Traffic and red lights were no match for this vehicle. If vehicles or traffic lights blocked our way, our flashing lights and sirens came on. If these didn't work, my friend announced menancingly, "Move out of the way!" on the loud speaker. Vehicle and pedestrian traffic alike were quick to clear the path.

I said, "This is pretty wild, but uh…."

He responded with,  "Training."

Then he received what sounded like an important call:  "Yes, sir. Roger that."

He had to get going. We raced up to my work. I noticed some people looking, realizing they couldn't see through the tinted windows. He stopped the black beast abruptly. I suppose the spectators were wondering who the VIP was about to exit the vehicle. I slowly opened the door, trying to create suspense, and stepped out.

I'm not sure if they thought I was a boldface name. But I'm sure they were disappointed by not having a clue who I was.

My friend didn't have to time to stick around.  "It's a critical mission; have to get my boss to Starbucks,"  he said.

Friday, 20 November 2009

Penn Squirrels Found! Exclusive!

WC I-Team Finds Penn Squirrels





The I-Team, Writers Clearinghouse's crack Investigative Team, has found found Penn's missing squirrels, and has photographic proof. Our round-the-clock investigation wasn't easy. Lots of nuts and cheetos.

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

Wednesday, 19 August 2009

White Coat Ceremony ...


... At Penn Medical School


By Ernest F. Rosato --14 August 2009


Thank you, Deans Morrison and Goldfarb.


Thank you, Dr. Morris for that introduction. Thank you for the privilege of this assignment.

When I hear myself introduced in this fashion, my initial reaction is that I can hardly wait to hear what I have to say; and hope that I measure up. In that regard I have asked my current medical students whether they remember their White Coat Ceremony. All do and with great enthusiasm. But, when asked what the Keynote Speaker had to say, I generally draw a blank. So listen-up! I shall see you again. There may be a quiz in a few years.

Welcome to this newest class of this oldest medical school in America. Welcome to your parents and other loved ones who are here to celebrate with you. Welcome to your first year at the school of medicine. Welcome from someone who has just completed his first year of his second half century. My love for this school, and its traditions remains undiminished. Tradition is the theme of the day. Tradition – The handing down of information, beliefs, and customs, by word of mouth or by example from one generation to another without a written instruction. This is not the formal history; this represents the stories that we tell one another when we gather at a later day and recount our common experience. It is what bonds us together in a shared remembrance, generally of good times of life. This day also recognizes the humanistic themes of a medical life. The White Coat Ceremony culminates in the recitation of the Oath of Hippocrates. You will state that you will practice in an honorable manner considering only the benefit to fellow humans. Also to be just and generous to each other. Do not forget this. You are to be good and faithful to your patients but you are also to be good to one another. Nothing is sadder to see than a physician seeking his/her advancement by denigrating his colleagues.

My favorite story illustrating medical rightness is the parable of the Good Samaritan. It is from the Gospel of Luke, Luke the Physician. An expert in law asked Jesus how to attain eternal life, the rabbi replied with a question. What is written in the law? The man answered, "Love the Lord your God and love your neighbor as yourself". And Jesus replied, "You have answered correctly. Do this and you will live." But the man followed up. "Who is my neighbor, teacher?" And then the parable. A man set upon by robbers was left half dead without possessions or even clothes. He was passed over by several of his countrymen. But a Samaritan took pity, bound his wounds, took him to an Inn and cared for him. On leaving he left money with the innkeeper to look after him. Jesus asked, "Who was the good neighbor?" Remember this parable when you repeat after Hippocrates. "I will practice my art in uprighteousness and honor. That unto whatever home I shall enter, it shall be for the good of the sick to the utmost of my power." The Samaritan was not kinsman, no monetary reward was possible, his travels and own life were interrupted, and no thanks were asked for. A human is broken. The tradition of medicine is to provide care. Care indeed for the very least of your neighbors. You will confront these issues many times and it will not always be easy. Do your best.

The white coat of course is not tradition but a symbol of tradition. Physicians did not always dress this way. In the old days when physicians attended homes they wore ordinary clothes. When they attended homes, they saw their patient in a different setting from an office or hospital, saw them in the midst of a family often dependant upon the patient, certainly loving the patient, and certainly all affected by the illness that the physician was there to attend. Only later did the white coat become emblematic of medicine and this occurred in the last century when science and technology provided rapid advances in medical care, and when medical care shifted from care in the home to care in an office or a hospital. It was in this setting that donning the white coat became a means to identify with laboratory science which was elevating medical care to new and higher levels. "The scientific physician." But as in all things in life, something gained is something lost. Many felt that the shift to science provided the best care but that it came with the loss of the human touch. But so, so what. I don't need a nice doctor, I need a good doctor, and of course this is at least half true. No one wants to shoot the rapids with an amateur at the helm. We must be good physicians and this school will provide you with that skill if you work at it. But in truth the journey often ends badly, sometimes quickly, sometimes agonizingly slowly. Some of the most thankful letters I have received came from those times where science failed but we did not forget that these were human passengers. It was in this spirit that the white coat ceremony was born, spearheaded by Dr. Arnold Gold at Columbia (Neurologist and Pediatrician). I have no doubt that, if asked, each of you would say that the prospective joy of a medical life is to care for people. This ceremony is not to confirm that intention in you, but to say that we in the School of Medicine share your dedication and affirm its beauty.

Just as an aside, you probably know that your new white coat is now under some attack. Some claim that it harbors bacteria that threatens patients, some that it frightens people so that they avoid the doctor because of a "white coat" syndrome. It reminds me of a time when you were coming up to get your driver's license. As your time approached rumors would surface that in fact the driving age was just about to be raised. Worry! Worry! But no matter, the white coat is a symbol, it is not the tradition. Whether it is outlawed or retained will not change the spirit in which you don it today.

You ask, "Where did it all begin, this Pennsylvania tradition"? Today's presentations will provide some of that history. The founding by John Morgan and William Shippen, Jr., sons of Philadelphia who went abroad to study in Edinburgh, Scotland, hence the thistle in the School of Medicine emblem. How they returned to their city to found the first medical school in the American Colonies. That school has prospered under generations of leaders. You will see some of the list of these illustrious names and their great accomplishments. Thomas Eakins' portrait of D. Hayes Agnew in the Agnew Clinic immortalizes the development of the Department of Surgery and heralds in the age of scientific advancement in medicine.

David Y. Cooper, writing in his book, "The Innovation and Tradition at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine" recognizes this history thus no one walks alone through the halls of the University of Pennsylvania; all are accompanied by the many portraits on the wall, the busts on the pedestals, and the memorabilia in the display cases. They tell in passing the history of an institution that extends back more than 240 years. The first medical school in this country. But you ask, "Where did it all begin for you?" Remember that I think of tradition as an unwritten passage passed through the generations. I of course, and like you, arrived here with my own traditions. I had good parents, a physician father, so that I knew something of a medical life, 8 years with the Catholic nuns – You are always seen and a record is kept, 8 years with the Jesuits – whose motto was for the greater glory of God and whose goal was a sound mind and a sound body. I was directed here, actually sent, by my Professor and Chair of Biology Dr. Mark Bauer, a Jesuit priest with a Ph.D. from Princeton. He assured me that the tradition of learning here was best and I never found cause to disagree. This school provided me with the education that made me a good physician in 1962. It provided me with the tradition of learning that I think has allowed me to remain a good physician in 2009.

Where did it all begin for me? It began with Professors who were not yet pictures on the wall, nor names on buildings. They walked the halls in buildings which were named for their own predecessors. Let me tell you of a few. Isidor Ravdin, whose picture hangs in the lobby of the main entrance to the hospital, the Ravdin Institute, was born in Indiana, came to Medical School at the University of Pennsylvania in 1916 and stayed for a long and productive life. He was Chairman of Surgery from 1945 to 1960. He was a giant of his time with exceptional achievements in medicine, in the military in World War II, and in civic affairs. Rav, as his friends and admirers called him, had a vibrant personality and a love for all people great and small. He could be a demanding man, sometimes harsh, sometimes paternalistic, as was characteristic of surgery in the day. He was demanding but forgiving. For example if you somehow failed to measure up, he would fire you. "You're fired" he would say, and there was no appeal. You simply left for a few hours, and then you returned. The matter would not be mentioned again. Point made, and received. For all of that paternalism and bruskness, everyone loved Rav because he loved his students and believed in them. The best illustration of this was his own surgery. Dr. Rhoads relates the story in his memoires. Dr. Ravdin had developed cholecystitis and needed gallbladder surgery. Dr. Alan O. Whipple came down from New York and Dr. Eldridge Eliason the Chairman of Surgery here was also in attendance. Dr. Jonathan Rhoads went to pick up Betty Ravdin, thinking his rose to be social support but was told on arrival that Rav had said he was to do the surgery and Whipple would assist. Dr. Rhoads was two years out of his training. He believed in his students. Dr. Ravdin was devoted to research and education. His famous address to the American College of Surgeons was entitled, "A Physician and Something More." He spurred the surgical community to embrace the scholarly life. This was heady stuff for us youngsters who previously thought that physicians came from the debating societies and surgeons from the rugby field. But if you were to run with Rav; your sights had to be set high. You had to be something more. Dr. Rhoads again, "Dr. Ravdin was at his best as a developer of young people. His vision of what they could accomplish was generally more optimistic than their own; and with his encouragement they often rose to his expectations rather than be limited by their own narrow horizons." A physician and something more. Julian Johnson was the first Professor of Cardiothoracic Surgery here. His portrait is in the anteroom outside Medical Alumni Hall in the Maloney Building. He is in surgical garb and his steely resolve is obvious. He had an intensity in patient care that was surely fueled by the frequent failures encountered during these pioneer days of heart surgery. No expenditure of energy no amount of time spent was considered too much. He drove himself and he drove his protégés very hard. Many found him too hard but he also had many admirerers and I was one of them. He told me once that he never was hard on someone who had made a mistake. They would be hard enough on themselves and needed support rather than further criticism. It was failure of effort and dedication that drew his ire. When someone recognized you for an accomplishment he would say, "I taught him everything he knows" if he concurred with the compliment. Once shortly before his death he shared a hospital room with my patient scheduled for surgery the following day. After we exchanged pleasantries, Dr. Johnson told my patient that he need have no concerns because, "I taught him everything he knows". Dr. Johnson was dying and he knew it and yet he could reach out to comfort his roommate and to provide for me his final assessment that he was satisfied with how I had turned out. That was the last time that I saw him. I recall he told me that we don't always recognize our best teachers in the event but only with the passage of time. The best are not always the easiest and they always push you to excel.

I have singled-out these two because of my relationship with them in my earliest years; years most similar to your present style of life. I have not tried to encompass Dr. Jonathan Rhoads who hangs on the wall of the Rhoads Pavilion because he guided my surgical life for forty years as mentor and colleague. I can only urge you to read about him. He was a most extraordinary man, and exerted a most extraordinary influence.

Tradition -– The oral telling from one generation to the next. When we older surgeons gather, we still speak of these men, tell stories about them, and they live in us because they have changed our hearts and souls. When we are gone, they will retreat back on to the walls, brought out only on great occasions such as this. Their stories will be replaced by stories about others. The Department under Dr. Barker, Dr. Kaiser, and now Dr. Drebin yes and hopefully stories about me and that will be pleasing because stories about me reflect what I have learned from these men and the countless others who have been here for the past fifty years. Rosato stories do abound. They reflect the stories that I received that I then took into my soul and bent them a certain way and out they came as Rosato lore. But it is not Rosato lore, it is the lore of this University. This is the essence of tradition. We take the story, we bring it into ourselves, and then we pass it along in one continuing spirit, the tradition of medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. So you ask where does it all begin? For you, it begins today. You will hear the story, you will bend it, you will pass it on. I envy you, your youth and the pleasure of this school that await you. You are gathered here in your clean white coats. Soon, too quickly, you will finish. Your coat will have some frays, some smudges, but it will fit you better. You will be more comfortable in it. Then if you look inside you may imagine a faint hue of red and blue. You will indeed be a physician, and something more.

Thursday, 13 August 2009

The End is Near




... Click Here:

___________________________________________________________________

Saturday, 27 June 2009

Junto Goes Worldwide

'Round the World

With Junto

Junto is expanding its worldwide audience beyond its traditional readership audience in the United States and the United Kingdom, a statistical analysis by our data recorder, StatCounter, reports.

Rounding out the top locales are France, Sweden, the United Arab Emirates, and Nigeria. As Joe Friday would say, 'Just the facts, maam, just the facts.' I don't understand, either.

StatCounter also tells us that, besides regular readers who have us bookmarked, Google searches account for most hits, with the following keywords amongst those used:

george frazier, inga saffron, justine shapiro, chevaliers du tastevin, montreal, henry viii, brian tierney, richard carreno, david traub, daniele thomas easton, dave rotchelle, and, of course, others.

Some of the above keywords are easily recognisible as Junto staples, or writers. Besides the obvious, who knows?

--- RDC



Thursday, 28 May 2009

One Story in 11 Million







Ex File
London.

Funny thing about ex girlfriends. Even in a city of 11 millions like London, they,she keeps popping up.

Lucinda and I broke up about 10 years ago, pretty much amicably when we realized that a long distance relationship (Philadelphia/London) wasn't going to work. This after many years in London where I worked before moving to Philly in 1999. Lucinda was a frequent visitor to Philadelphia, as I was to London over the immediate years. I loved London, She adored Philly. Go figure.

But you never know about amicable.
I was in London last week. I've been back numerous times before. But never back to Richmond where Lucinda and I shared digs in Kings Road for almost five years. So when I returned to London last week and -- for the first time -- visited Richmond, I had some trepidation that I might run into the old flame. I was visiting with one of my best buds, Dave, who told me that he hadn't seen Lucinda around town for ages. Had she moved? Never mind. We just did our Richmond thing.
My last day in London was last Sunday. I showered, shaved, checked my rez, and headed to the breakfast room for my last English breakfast before heading to Philly later that afternoon. I settled in at a table with a young couple, shared some conversation, but my eyes went on to scan the dining room of the Penn Club, the place in Bloomsbury where I was staying. (Named after William Penn. Not UPenn).
Halo, across the room was a good-looking blond, alone, savoring her breakfast. Good looker, I thought -- and then it stuck me! It was Lucinda!
Should I approach her? Bad idea. I had no interest in rekindling any of the past.
Then how could I escape? Obviously, I couldn't cross the breakfast room. She, being near the exit door, would surely spy me.
Instead, I ducked behind my table into the kitchen, hoping to make my escape via a kitchen door. Oops! No door. My first impulse was to duck through a window into a backyard garden. Fortunately, seconds before doing this, I checked out a butler's door (midget size) that led to a main hall. I made my way through this door to my fourth floor room. I was in a cold sweat.
Retracing my steps, I checked out of the hotel. Was Lucinda a guest? I inquired. She wasn't registered. But that wasn't key, I was told. She was probably a companion of another guest.
Then I put it together. Philadelphia and William Penn. Lucinda was connecting the dots from our past association. Probably with another. Out the door, scurrying off to Russell Square. Exit.
--RDC

Monday, 12 January 2009

Gallery







Bits 'n Bobs



Please Touch Museum, Philly


Junto powered by Writers Clearinghouse